| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.29) 01/08/2012 18:25:12
|
P1NKFROSTDONUT
Joined: 07/04/2010 13:39:48
Messages: 361
Location: Tampa, FL
Offline
|
Efbomb wrote:
P1NKFROSTDONUT wrote:How is girardi an 82?
Cause he gets no respect from anyone other than ranger fans.
They don't get to see him play every game to realize how crazy good he is. If he could just get some pts, you're looking at a Norris candidate.
I'm a Tampa fan and after seeing him play and the minutes he takes in he should be at least an 86.
|
CHL_Goalie_36 wrote:Rocking chairs are soothing, anger is not.
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.29) 01/18/2012 00:36:00
|
CurlyGladiator
Joined: 06/13/2011 13:10:23
Messages: 16
Offline
|
Glad the new roster took 1 month. No player mid season ratings changes which I assumed was what they were working on. 1 month to unscratch a few injured players who have been playing for 3 weeks now anyway. Terrible. Just let us play with injured players online.(maybe players on IR can just be scratched) For the simple reason we all want to play with our favorite players, and EA YOU CAN'T KEEP UP WITH THE INJURIES. 2-3 week updates is too infrequent to have injured players scratched if they miss 1 or 2 games. I've never spoke to anyone who actually prefers it this way with the online rosters.
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.29) 01/18/2012 05:36:05
|
Efbomb
Joined: 10/02/2008 15:35:50
Messages: 829
Location: N.Y.C.
Offline
|
CurlyGladiator wrote:Glad the new roster took 1 month. No player mid season ratings changes which I assumed was what they were working on. 1 month to unscratch a few injured players who have been playing for 3 weeks now anyway. Terrible. Just let us play with injured players online.(maybe players on IR can just be scratched) For the simple reason we all want to play with our favorite players, and EA YOU CAN'T KEEP UP WITH THE INJURIES. 2-3 week updates is too infrequent to have injured players scratched if they miss 1 or 2 games. I've never spoke to anyone who actually prefers it this way with the online rosters.
Exactly. Roster updates every two weeks for offline play is fine. It's when EA dictates how long a player stays injured by not having daily updates for online play that really sucks.
I understand that they want to mimic the NHL rosters, but when a player sits out one game because of an injury right before the update, we can't use him for at least two weeks. That's the main reason why infrequent updates don't work.
|
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.29) 01/30/2012 06:50:06
|
b0nesaw316
Team Captain
Joined: 12/21/2009 14:07:07
Messages: 247
Offline
|
Hagelin's speed/accl needs to be increased to 94-95
Just pretend he plays for Vancouver, update his speed rating.
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.29) 02/03/2012 22:05:53
|
PYA-MUSTANG86
Joined: 06/24/2011 22:07:49
Messages: 378
Offline
|
b0nesaw316 wrote:Hagelin's speed/accl needs to be increased to 94-95
Just pretend he plays for Vancouver, update his speed rating.
Yeah no *. He is one of the fastest players around. Not to mention he won the speed skating competition. 84 speed is down right laughable. You're basically making him useless with such low speed, especially in online play. He should be anywhere between 93-95 speed.
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.29) 02/04/2012 06:54:53
|
CurlyGladiator
Joined: 06/13/2011 13:10:23
Messages: 16
Offline
|
How about Girardi's low rating still? Especially his 84 Endurance rating makes about zero sense as he leads the league in ice time and was one of the leaders in ice time last season as well.
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.29) 02/06/2012 06:46:09
|
CurlyGladiator
Joined: 06/13/2011 13:10:23
Messages: 16
Offline
|
CurlyGladiator wrote:How about Girardi's low rating still? Especially his 84 Endurance rating makes about zero sense as he leads the league in ice time and was one of the leaders in ice time last season as well.
Stepan up from 82 to 84 at least with latest update.
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.29) 02/07/2012 10:02:46
|
b0nesaw316
Team Captain
Joined: 12/21/2009 14:07:07
Messages: 247
Offline
|
CurlyGladiator wrote:
CurlyGladiator wrote:How about Girardi's low rating still? Especially his 84 Endurance rating makes about zero sense as he leads the league in ice time and was one of the leaders in ice time last season as well.
Stepan up from 82 to 84 at least with latest update.
Stepan didn't even deserve the rating increase. Now he is better offensively than Callahan.
I don't understand how anyone could actually raise ratings for Stepan & Stralman, but not Callahan & Girardi
Girardi should be 87 overall, not 82. He is one of the best DMen in the NHL
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.29) 02/28/2012 10:50:56
|
CurlyGladiator
Joined: 06/13/2011 13:10:23
Messages: 16
Offline
|
The lines have been much better lately. Don't you think a few more ratings bumps needed? McDonagh and Girardi?? They are the top pair on the #1 team in the East for the entire season. Just look at their stats. Stats however do not do them justice as they are defense first players always going against the other team's best players.
Also, McDonagh not only has no picture, but it says he was drafted by New York?? He was drafted by Montreal then traded in the infamous Gomez deal.
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.29) 02/29/2012 13:43:29
|
rk200278
Joined: 05/25/2011 13:55:03
Messages: 131
Offline
|
i still haven't seen a jersey tuck on hagelin, anisimov, or stralman
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.29) 02/29/2012 14:08:23
|
CurlyGladiator
Joined: 06/13/2011 13:10:23
Messages: 16
Offline
|
Carl Hagelin desperately needs a big ratings bump. He's one of the best rookies this season having 11 goals and 27 points in 43 games on a defense first team. He's also one of the fastest players in the league as seen in the NHL All-Star Superskills competition. He's only a 75 overall??
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.29) 03/02/2012 18:29:17
|
CurlyGladiator
Joined: 06/13/2011 13:10:23
Messages: 16
Offline
|
CurlyGladiator wrote:The lines have been much better lately. Don't you think a few more ratings bumps needed? McDonagh and Girardi?? They are the top pair on the #1 team in the East for the entire season. Just look at their stats. Stats however do not do them justice as they are defense first players always going against the other team's best players.
Also, McDonagh not only has no picture, but it says he was drafted by New York?? He was drafted by Montreal then traded in the infamous Gomez deal.
Great job on the new post deadline rosters. Hagelin is usable at an 80 rating now, and his speed was increased to an 89! Girardi and McDonagh got increases where needed as well. Even McDonagh's drafted team was corrected. I was "almost" convinced that no one from EA ever looked at these message boards. Great job. Thanks!
|
|
|
 |
|
|