| Poll |
| WR Micheal Crabtree has yet to sign his contract with the 49ers, which means he is not an NFL player. should EA remove Crabtree from the game since he is not a player? |
| Yes |
 
|
70% |
[ 85 ] |
| No |
 
|
30% |
[ 36 ] |
| Total Votes : 121 |
|
| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/madden12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 09/06/2009 19:40:11
|
tholyoak3
Joined: 07/13/2009 03:46:32
Messages: 596
Offline
|
CSO_SUB.minh707 wrote:It would be unfair removing Michael Crabtree from the 49ers because EA did not remove JaMarcus Russell even though he signed later in the season.
im pretty sure jamarcus had signed by this time, i may be mistaken
|
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/madden12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 09/06/2009 19:41:50
|
dawkinseffect5
Joined: 08/26/2009 21:55:11
Messages: 75
Offline
|
Russell signed on Sept 12, which could be after week 1 or week2, I dont know
|
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/madden12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 09/06/2009 19:44:10
|
minh707
Joined: 06/02/2007 19:46:51
Messages: 934
Offline
|
cem_ea_id.dawkinseffect5 wrote:Russell signed on Sept 12, which could be after week 1 or week2, I dont know
He missed 3 weeks. He was activated by week 4. So you must take out Jamarcus Russell for 3 NFL weeks if Michael Crabtree gets removed from the 49ers roster.
|
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/madden12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 09/06/2009 19:44:32
|
dawkinseffect5
Joined: 08/26/2009 21:55:11
Messages: 75
Offline
|
Russell signed between week 1 and week 2 of the 2007 season
|
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/madden12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 09/06/2009 19:45:04
|
dawkinseffect5
Joined: 08/26/2009 21:55:11
Messages: 75
Offline
|
CSO_SUB.minh707 wrote:
cem_ea_id.dawkinseffect5 wrote:Russell signed on Sept 12, which could be after week 1 or week2, I dont know
He missed 3 weeks. He was activated by week 4. So you must take out Jamarcus Russell for 3 NFL weeks if Michael Crabtree gets removed from the 49ers roster.
no Russell signed a few days after week 1 ended...which meant he could be in the game.
|
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/madden12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 09/06/2009 19:49:18
|
minh707
Joined: 06/02/2007 19:46:51
Messages: 934
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/madden12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 09/06/2009 19:52:15
|
dawkinseffect5
Joined: 08/26/2009 21:55:11
Messages: 75
Offline
|
so???
just because it says week 4 doesn't mean nothing. he signed Sept 12th, which means he was on the roster after week 1 and before week 2. Russell only missed 3 or 4 days as an NFL player during the regular season, he still could have played week 2 but why would you put in a guy who hasn't practiced?
|
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/madden12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 09/06/2009 19:53:49
|
minh707
Joined: 06/02/2007 19:46:51
Messages: 934
Offline
|
cem_ea_id.dawkinseffect5 wrote:so???
just because it says week 4 doesn't mean nothing. he signed Sept 12th, which means he was on the roster after week 1 and before week 2. Russell only missed 3 or 4 days as an NFL player during the regular season, he still could have played week 2 but why would you put in a guy who hasn't practiced?
Then Jamarcus Russell must be removed from this game for 1 NFL week into the regular season.
|
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/madden12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 09/06/2009 19:55:09
|
dawkinseffect5
Joined: 08/26/2009 21:55:11
Messages: 75
Offline
|
maybe he was...that was 3 years ago, do you remember if he was or wasn't?
|
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/madden12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 09/06/2009 19:56:13
|
minh707
Joined: 06/02/2007 19:46:51
Messages: 934
Offline
|
cem_ea_id.dawkinseffect5 wrote:maybe he was...that was 3 years ago, do you remember if he was or wasn't?
Lets just agree for 1 NFL week because I don't remember.
|
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/madden12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 09/06/2009 20:01:10
|
Jedi Master Ed
Joined: 01/06/2008 17:44:34
Messages: 44
Offline
|
remove him from online play, but put him in franchise so you have a chance to sign him lol, just make his asking price astronimical
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/madden12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 09/06/2009 20:01:36
|
dawkinseffect5
Joined: 08/26/2009 21:55:11
Messages: 75
Offline
|
ok, but still Crabtree hasn't signed, he can't be a free agent since the 49ers own his rights. so he basically is in limbo and shouldn't be in madden at all
|
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/madden12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 09/06/2009 21:45:04
|
Joel98Ag
Joined: 08/28/2009 00:00:15
Messages: 6
Offline
|
Take Crabtree out. When/If he signs, put him back in. Not hard.
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/madden12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 09/07/2009 04:56:31
|
dawkinseffect5
Joined: 08/26/2009 21:55:11
Messages: 75
Offline
|
agreed
|
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/madden12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 09/07/2009 06:14:01
|
BEEFSTEWx926x
Joined: 09/02/2009 02:13:29
Messages: 29
Offline
|
Heres my take on it. Im a niners fan, and i use the niners when i play my franchise. frankly i could care less if he is on or not. he doesnt have overwhelming speed-88, or great awareness, sure he has the potential to be great, but most of the time you only have 2 or 3 recievers on the field when using the niners. Ive found him useful and nice to have around when i need someone to jump and get a ball, but otherwise he's a salary drain on the game and the niners arent hurting for wideouts. Plus i think Josh Morgan will end up being the better receiver on that team anyway, so honestly, Michael who?
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 09/07/2009 06:14:28
|
|
|
 |
|
|