I voted Lions. That defensive line looks like it can really mess things up for Aaron Rodgers and Brett Favre. I'm still not sold on Stafford, but he should get some much needed help with Best and a healthy Smith.

buccaners because whoever finishes last in the south then the next year they make the playoffs

cem_ea_id.princewookiee wrote:buccaners because whoever finishes last in the south then the next year they make the playoffs

Lol no

cem_ea_id.MiamiDolphins88 wrote:

cem_ea_id.princewookiee wrote:buccaners because whoever finishes last in the south then the next year they make the playoffs

Lol no

if you look at the history you know it will happen mark my word

cem_ea_id.princewookiee wrote:

cem_ea_id.MiamiDolphins88 wrote:

cem_ea_id.princewookiee wrote:buccaners because whoever finishes last in the south then the next year they make the playoffs

Lol no

if you look at the history you know it will happen mark my word

History can be broken.

Week 1 Browns at Bucs L
Week 2 Bucs at Panthers L
Week 3 Steelers at Bucs L
Week 4 bye week
Week 5 Bucs at Bengals L
Week 6 Saints at Bucs L
Week 7 Rams at Bucs W
Week 8 Bucs at Cards L
Week 9 Bucs at Falcons L
Week 10 Panthers at Bucs L
Week 11 Bucs at 49ers L
Week 12 Bucs at Ravens L
Week 13 Falcons at Bucs L
Week 14 Bucs at Redskins L
Week 15 Lions at Bucs W
Week 16 Seahawks at Bucs L
Week 17 Bucs at Saints L

MAIN.EnterSandman2828 wrote:

cem_ea_id.TheBlackHole21 wrote:Lol Like Mcnabb had Wrs in Philly.....He had a bunch of nobodys overs the years who he made into productive guys.

Weren't you the guy that criticized me for not reading posts?

lol what? I don't remember that....what would be your point anyway? I read the post. Dawkins said Mcnabb doesn't have Wrs and I said he didn't have any in Philly either.

cem_ea_id.TheBlackHole21 wrote:lol what? I don't remember that....what would be your point anyway? I read the post. Dawkins said Mcnabb doesn't have Wrs and I said he didn't have any in Philly either.

I was sure it was in our discussion about the impact of Campbell on the Raiders but whatever. My point was that if you have read the posts, you would have realized that I already brought up your point and Dawkins had already explained his point.

MAIN.EnterSandman2828 wrote:

cem_ea_id.TheBlackHole21 wrote:lol what? I don't remember that....what would be your point anyway? I read the post. Dawkins said Mcnabb doesn't have Wrs and I said he didn't have any in Philly either.

I was sure it was in our discussion about the impact of Campbell on the Raiders but whatever. My point was that if you have read the posts, you would have realized that I already brought up your point and Dawkins had already explained his point.

I don't think so dude....Anyway I don't care what you posted really....I just made a comment about what I thought. Just because Dawk explained the D and Te situation doesn't change my position. Mcnabb didn't have Wr's in Philly but he will still put up numbers with the Skins Wrs. Thats my point......Dawkins has a different view....usually we all do.

Redskins D is also better than Philly's...

TUFF, but i will say the CHIEFS!!!...Campbell is gonna be good in oakland but those Coaches in KC make me think we are all in for a serious CHANGE!!!

Bucs Lions and Skins are all teams to look at. I say the Bucs will have the best record out of all of them, then the Skins then the Lions. All with close to playoff records, but no cigar.

cem_ea_id.soarindude02 wrote:Bucs Lions and Skins are all teams to look at. I say the Bucs will have the best record out of all of them, then the Skins then the Lions. All with close to playoff records, but no cigar.

LOL, Skins, Chiefs, and Rams before any of the rest...

Tampa Bay is in too tough of a division for me to consider them. They will have no less than 4, and possibly 5 or 6 losses in the division alone.

CHIEFS!!!!!

ps3.NIteMarE- wrote:Tampa Bay is in too tough of a division for me to consider them. They will have no less than 4, and possibly 5 or 6 losses in the division alone.

this is the history
2002 panthers 7-9 2003 11-5 super bowl birth
2003 falcons 5-11 2004 11-5 NFC conference championship game birth
2004 buccaneers 5-11 2005 11-5 wild card birth
2005 saints 3-13 2006 10-6 NFC championship game birth
2006 buccaneers 4-12 2007 9-7 wild card birth
2007 falcons 4-12 2008 11-5 wild card birth
2008 saints 8-8 2009 13-3 super bowl champions