nfs_web.d29rty wrote:this was found in textures archives in NFSWO files
http://www.picamatic.com/view/5709540_2-84-DXT1-nfs_c_ps-DEMO_WOR/

Any idea?

nfs_web.d29rty wrote:nfs texed 0.9.0 opens only .bin archives with textures. All I can say is that game is based on NFS Carbon. I found archive with all textures of cars logos that were available in Carbon, also there are textures of our teammates (Nikki and so on) and bosses like Kenji. Mazda RX7, presented in the beta has Kenji's vynil.

Speaking about new race tracks here is the texture:
http://www.picamatic.com/view/5709843_8-112-DXT1-nfs_c_ps-ADS_FAK/
but in the game it is named nfs_c_ps-ADS_FAKE1.. so it can be only a kind of an easter egg.

nfs_web.d29rty wrote:this was found in textures archives in NFSWO files
http://www.picamatic.com/view/5709540_2-84-DXT1-nfs_c_ps-DEMO_WOR/

Any idea?

cem_ea_id.jaizon wrote:Ok I completely get the excitement of the bridge jump at the end of Most Wanted. But doesn't it stand to reason that the bridge would be repaired if it was a main road to and from Carbon? Keeping it as a jump doesn't really make sense imo.

xbox.Dillano609 wrote:This is the map I decided to make seeing as how the original one for the game is completely off. There were canyons in NFS: Carbon so it would only make sense to make use of those canyons to connect Palmont and Rockport since that is how we got from Rockport to Palmont in the first place between games. I tried to take everything into consideration such as distance, (Rockport and Palmont are seperated by at least 10 miles according to the intro of NFSC) height, and location of each road. I also took into consideration the length of what each canyon actually is, behind and past the start and finish lines from my glitching in the past, along with the shape of the road in the final pursuit area (It coninues straight and makes a long 180 degree turn if you ever explored behind the construction). I also added San Juan and the Drift Course by analyzing their locations, from glitches, to what their respective locations should be. I added a highway as well since it would seem to make sense to connect Downtown Rockport to Silverton in Palmont.

I also took into consideration the locations of Tri-City and Bayview if they were added as expansions...

What does everyone think?

Here is the original map...



Here is my map...

nfs_web.Spooling wrote:DAMN YOU DILLANO! lol they could of added that in the future,like added on content..mann! =[

xbox.Dillano609 wrote:Yes, I admit I used your map as an outline. [...] I hope you don't mind that I used your map as an outline, after all, if it wasn't for your map I wouldn't have made mine, lol

It does matter. In Underground there was a bridge that was never lowered and I looked forward to jumping it. There's nothing like a good bridge jump to get the pulse racing-well there is..

Do you remember racing in Underground and being in second place, but once you got to the bridge you hit your NOS and overpass them while in the air and win the race. Oh hey exciting was that to you....

cem_ea_id.jaizon wrote:

It does matter. In Underground there was a bridge that was never lowered and I looked forward to jumping it. There's nothing like a good bridge jump to get the pulse racing-well there is..

Do you remember racing in Underground and being in second place, but once you got to the bridge you hit your NOS and overpass them while in the air and win the race. Oh hey exciting was that to you....

There's reading what I wrote and then there's understanding it. I covered the part where I understood the excitement of the bridge jump. But you completely ignored the part where I explained that if it was a bridge connecting the two games/cities, that it stands to reason it wouldn't (or shouldn't) remain a jump. Correct me if I'm wrong but it's a regular bridge in MW right? And in Underground it's a bridge that raises to let ships through? The MW bridge would be repaired because it's a common travel route. Whereas you just lower or raise the bridge accordingly in Underground.

cem_ea_id.Kaizeras wrote:EA just delayed NFS WO with an YEAR.

So there's a big chance to see the map in the way that it SHOULD be on release

nfs.RANDYORTON wrote:

cem_ea_id.Kaizeras wrote:EA just delayed NFS WO with an YEAR.

So there's a big chance to see the map in the way that it SHOULD be on release

When you say "EA just delayed NFS WO with an YEAR." that means Need for Speed World Online should be ready at the end of year 2010 lol, like how you said in this video more info:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySMmO1aSqE4&feature=related
On wikipedia NFS WO released date is 2010, so I think now is official...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Need_for_speed_world_online
Well, EA team of NFS WO start this game project about 1 year (at least that I heard)
I take a look at you tube videos with the NFS WO beta tests, game looks good like it is ready to be released I think... So WHAT THE HECK they are going to do in ONE MORE year? That is the question xD Canyons and others changed things on the map not takes more than a month right? In one year options of the game modify have NO LIMITS!
I have already start to think they are going to make this game on DVD LMAO!

MAIN.MrStalker89 wrote:Are you kidding me? Judging from those videos NFSWO is far, far from release. First of all, there are a ton of bugs making the game crash etc, and also you can clearly see opponent racers skipping all over the track so there's clearly a network communication problem. There's no cops yet, and probably loads of other content that needs to be added (cars, race modes, races, etc). I'm glad they aren't rushing NFSWO like they rushed Undercover.

And please, DO NOT underestimate the time and effort required to develop a game. As a person who have developed software myself, I feel offended.