How do u have Matt Schaub rated higher than Farve cmon r u serious wat a joke

Wow. EA listened to us. Thanks Donny Moore, you updated almost everything that we asked to be updated except for one big one which was Michael Jenkins speed but overall it was a great update. Thanks!

I'm looking forward to the following weeks now.

ps3.LATINFERNO wrote:You guys want 5 up/5down. We vote on them. We provide you with a LIST. We agreed on who we think should go up/down and very little is done? What's up with that? And if we (Eagles fans) are consistent on the SAME players OVER AND OVER (i.e. Quintin Mikell is TOO SLOW in speed/persuit). Why hasn't this been addressed? I'm sure we would ALL agree that correcting his player rating how it should be is more important than a measly 1 point increase to DeSean Jackson.

As a fellow Eagles fan, I'm not too disappointed with the update. The bumps to Cole and Bunkley are well deserved, and the Stacy Andrews decrease is good as well.

My two main gripes are still the lack of hit power for Sheldon Brown and the low carry rating for Westbrook.

I know people are upset with ATL getting alot of updates but they have been ignored every update and they just now got to us. Dont believe me? Go back and look at the past updates and look how we get one or two updates here and there and then its only a point increase. We are also not the first team to get an increase because of a loss but if you read what Donny says its nothing to do with wins or losses its the Individual.

I dont understand this update at all Denver is undefeated they clearly were underrated at the begining understandibly so, however the defense has been lights out the offense has been efficient and at times flawless. Clearly more than 4 players deserved and upgrade in the past two weeks. They have played potential playoof teams all year except for the browns come on need to do better. We were promised an increase for Orton if he continued to play well hello hasnt he done this? Still waiting for parity in these updates and not who the analysts obviously like.

cem_ea_id.gbpckrs13 wrote:

ps3.typhil21 wrote:green bay D has been inflated by playing STL, DET, and CLE 3 of last 4 games

ok cool still a top 5 d until proven other wise you play whos on ur schedule..

True, just saying, but from what ive seen they have made a good transition to the 3-4 but kampman needs to get back on track then they will be very dangerous

Can someone tell me how to go to the team threads and when does this update come out anyway cant we be more specific than soon? And is it that updates come out every two weeks and not every week?

ps3.pt21 wrote:How do u have Matt Schaub rated higher than Farve cmon r u serious wat a joke

Schaub is better IMO

what's sad is that EA ignoring the broncos was totally predicted. And they did anyway.

ps3.typhil21 wrote:

cem_ea_id.gbpckrs13 wrote:

ps3.typhil21 wrote:green bay D has been inflated by playing STL, DET, and CLE 3 of last 4 games

ok cool still a top 5 d until proven other wise you play whos on ur schedule..

True, just saying, but from what ive seen they have made a good transition to the 3-4 but kampman needs to get back on track then they will be very dangerous

Kampman is doing fine, there is no way to tell what the defense is asking him to do. He also Leads the team in QB pressures so not sure what you mean by get back on track.


and the funny thing about our schedule is the Vikings played the EXACT same 3 teams you just listed and they are 23rd, so I'd love to hear someone explain that...

what it means is the defense is playing more consistent than the Vikings.

grandchampion 13 an wat ways is matt better than farve an farve should be atleast a 89 how he has played this year

what's sad is that EA ignoring the broncos was totally predicted. And they did anyway.

what's sad is that EA ignoring the broncos was totally predicted. And they did anyway.

ps3.LATINFERNO wrote:Atlanta has FIFTEEN UPDATED PLAYERS. New Orleans gets SIXTEEN UPDATED PLAYERS. While Philly gets SIX? How is that evenly distributed at ALL? Let's at least be fair when you are doing updates. That's just ridiculous. You really need to stick to the 5 UP/5 DOWN and let the fans of specific teams get their players rated accordingly. We shouldn't have to be subject to what YOU think is ABSOLUTE. We are the ones buying the game, we are the customers, and it's clear that we aren't being heard.

I don't know how you can complain about the Saints 16 increases. They started out low so they are finally getting a justified increase at the O-line and the DB's who lead the league in Int's. The Oline was underrated, the Saints are the #1 offense in the NFL and are like #3 in rushing yet the O-line had 3 playes in the 76 range and 1 66.
How can you complain when the Eagles lost to the Raiders and the Saints?

WHAT?????? How do the Saints get 16 players updated and the Vikings only TWO!!!! and Brett Favre is NOT AN 87 overall what a JOKE!! Vikings fans have been more than patient this is OUTRAGE. Brett TORCHED Baltimore and TORCHED the Steelers. His wide out, Percy Harvin, DROPPED 2 Touchdown passes! And some other receivers dropped some key ones. He played FANTASTIC all SEASON and EVERYONE knows this is downright screwed up. Vikings fan or not in yall s forums give respect to Brett man you guys know if he was on your team and 6-1 should be 7-0 with 12td 3 int (2 because the wide out tipped the ball that hit em right on the hands) You would be calling for this man to be at least a 90. Seriously this is crap. I hate to but Donny serioulsy you must be a Favre Viking hater. Dude all we've done but win and only minimal updates the entire year. Other teams get 6-7 players on average. We GET 2-3 IF THAT!