| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/eaforum/templates/default/skins/ea_sports/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11/04/2009 18:37:10
|
tombradykiksars
Joined: 11/04/2009 17:51:05
Messages: 160
Offline
|
Red this first too...
http://espn.go.com/page2/s/list/nfl/offenses/best.html
I can't even put the Saints above the 49ers led by Young LOL, and the Pats are equal to or better than the Rams... the only reason people even think so is because they don't like the Pats LOL.
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/eaforum/templates/default/skins/ea_sports/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11/04/2009 18:39:50
|
CrAzAnEsS
Joined: 08/21/2008 12:34:09
Messages: 1871
Location: Canada!
Offline
|
no Pats offense is the best ever. there happy? you going to stop spamming?
|
CHILD PLEASE
Q: What do the Leafs and the Titanic have in common?
A: They both look good until they hit the ice. |
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/eaforum/templates/default/skins/ea_sports/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11/04/2009 19:05:44
|
SFU ExclusiVe
Team Captain
Joined: 08/06/2009 03:44:36
Messages: 2039
Offline
|
Hmmm...
Well, since the 07 Pats lost to the 07 Giants, doesn't that mean the 07 Giants have a better offense?
09 Saints are better in my mind because they have just as good of a passing game, but 5x the running game and 2x the defense.
|
Baltimore Ravens' Team Captain |
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/eaforum/templates/default/skins/ea_sports/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11/04/2009 19:18:57
|
tombradykiksars
Joined: 11/04/2009 17:51:05
Messages: 160
Offline
|
xbox.SFU ExclusiVe wrote:Hmmm...
Well, since the 07 Pats lost to the 07 Giants, doesn't that mean the 07 Giants have a better offense?
09 Saints are better in my mind because they have just as good of a passing game, but 5x the running game and 2x the defense.
LOL@ 5 times the run game and 2 times the Defense ROFLMAO. Thats is slander to Bill Bellichick. every since 2001 all the Pats Defenses have been at least 5 times better than the saints and their run game isn't 2 times better. The Pats Passing is 10 times better though.
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/eaforum/templates/default/skins/ea_sports/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11/04/2009 19:20:09
|
tombradykiksars
Joined: 11/04/2009 17:51:05
Messages: 160
Offline
|
xbox.SFU ExclusiVe wrote:Hmmm...
Well, since the 07 Pats lost to the 07 Giants, doesn't that mean the 07 Giants have a better offense?
09 Saints are better in my mind because they have just as good of a passing game, but 5x the running game and 2x the defense.
also LOL at the fact that just because they won they have a better offense... just because the rams lost to us in 01 doesn't mean our offense is better... their offense was at least 3 times better.
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/eaforum/templates/default/skins/ea_sports/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11/04/2009 19:51:31
|
SFU ExclusiVe
Team Captain
Joined: 08/06/2009 03:44:36
Messages: 2039
Offline
|
Well, since we are talking about "Offense" here, and I'm going to assume you know that there are 2 parts to offense:
Passing and Rushing.
The Saints have just as good of a passing game as the 2007 Patriots.
The Saints have a BETTER rushing attack than the 2007 Patriots.
Therefore, the Saints are the better team.
|
Baltimore Ravens' Team Captain |
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/eaforum/templates/default/skins/ea_sports/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11/04/2009 19:54:42
|
Seanyboii20
Joined: 11/13/2008 01:40:10
Messages: 758
Online
|
How many times do you have to get banned to realize nobody likes you?
|
BAN PATKICKARSE! |
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/eaforum/templates/default/skins/ea_sports/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11/04/2009 19:56:25
|
tombradykiksars
Joined: 11/04/2009 17:51:05
Messages: 160
Offline
|
xbox.SFU ExclusiVe wrote:Well, since we are talking about "Offense" here, and I'm going to assume you know that there are 2 parts to offense:
Passing and Rushing.
The Saints have just as good of a passing game as the 2007 Patriots.
The Saints have a BETTER rushing attack than the 2007 Patriots.
Therefore, the Saints are the better team.
LOL is brees on pace to throwing 50 TD's? NO, is Brees on pace to throwing 4800 yards? NO. Hell the Saints offense isn't even better than the 2004 Colts offense
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/eaforum/templates/default/skins/ea_sports/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11/04/2009 19:57:28
|
tombradykiksars
Joined: 11/04/2009 17:51:05
Messages: 160
Offline
|
xbox.Seanyboii20 wrote:How many times do you have to get banned to realize nobody likes you?
LOL I'm supposed to care about what people think about me on the internet? I thought the internet was where you can say anything you want and have no effect on you? I guess not.
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/eaforum/templates/default/skins/ea_sports/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11/04/2009 19:58:18
|
SFU ExclusiVe
Team Captain
Joined: 08/06/2009 03:44:36
Messages: 2039
Offline
|
cem_ea_id.tombradykiksars wrote:
xbox.SFU ExclusiVe wrote:Well, since we are talking about "Offense" here, and I'm going to assume you know that there are 2 parts to offense:
Passing and Rushing.
The Saints have just as good of a passing game as the 2007 Patriots.
The Saints have a BETTER rushing attack than the 2007 Patriots.
Therefore, the Saints are the better team.
LOL is brees on pace to throwing 50 TD's? NO, is Brees on pace to throwing 4800 yards? NO. Hell the Saints offense isn't even better than the 2004 Colts offense
LOL are the Saints a 1-Dimensional team? NO, do the Saints actually have a rushing game? YES, are the Saints better in terms of offense, YES.
Doesn't take a darn rocket scientist to figure that out.
Hell, my high school QB just set a record for passing yards in a season last night. Why? He has a full ride to WSU (so you know he's not good) but our team is 1 dimensional! That's why!
|
Baltimore Ravens' Team Captain |
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/eaforum/templates/default/skins/ea_sports/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11/04/2009 19:59:59
|
CrAzAnEsS
Joined: 08/21/2008 12:34:09
Messages: 1871
Location: Canada!
Offline
|
cem_ea_id.tombradykiksars wrote:
xbox.SFU ExclusiVe wrote:Well, since we are talking about "Offense" here, and I'm going to assume you know that there are 2 parts to offense:
Passing and Rushing.
The Saints have just as good of a passing game as the 2007 Patriots.
The Saints have a BETTER rushing attack than the 2007 Patriots.
Therefore, the Saints are the better team.
LOL is brees on pace to throwing 50 TD's? NO, is Brees on pace to throwing 4800 yards? NO. Hell the Saints offense isn't even better than the 2004 Colts offense
Is the Patriots on pace to due better than the Saints on offense this year? NO. Oh no, too bad that's all that matters. THE HERE AND NOW!
|
CHILD PLEASE
Q: What do the Leafs and the Titanic have in common?
A: They both look good until they hit the ice. |
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/eaforum/templates/default/skins/ea_sports/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11/04/2009 20:08:19
|
tombradykiksars
Joined: 11/04/2009 17:51:05
Messages: 160
Offline
|
xbox.CrAzAnEsS wrote:
cem_ea_id.tombradykiksars wrote:
xbox.SFU ExclusiVe wrote:Well, since we are talking about "Offense" here, and I'm going to assume you know that there are 2 parts to offense:
Passing and Rushing.
The Saints have just as good of a passing game as the 2007 Patriots.
The Saints have a BETTER rushing attack than the 2007 Patriots.
Therefore, the Saints are the better team.
LOL is brees on pace to throwing 50 TD's? NO, is Brees on pace to throwing 4800 yards? NO. Hell the Saints offense isn't even better than the 2004 Colts offense
Is the Patriots on pace to due better than the Saints on offense this year? NO. Oh no, too bad that's all that matters. THE HERE AND NOW!
Actually they are LOL. take off their defensive scores and the Pats Offense is very comparable to the Pats
Saints total points 273-36/7= 33.8
Patriots total points 198-6/7= 27.3
if the Pats keep up with how they have been doing in the past 3 or 4 weeks, they'll go back up to 34+
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/eaforum/templates/default/skins/ea_sports/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11/04/2009 20:09:51
|
tombradykiksars
Joined: 11/04/2009 17:51:05
Messages: 160
Offline
|
xbox.SFU ExclusiVe wrote:
cem_ea_id.tombradykiksars wrote:
xbox.SFU ExclusiVe wrote:Well, since we are talking about "Offense" here, and I'm going to assume you know that there are 2 parts to offense:
Passing and Rushing.
The Saints have just as good of a passing game as the 2007 Patriots.
The Saints have a BETTER rushing attack than the 2007 Patriots.
Therefore, the Saints are the better team.
LOL is brees on pace to throwing 50 TD's? NO, is Brees on pace to throwing 4800 yards? NO. Hell the Saints offense isn't even better than the 2004 Colts offense
LOL are the Saints a 1-Dimensional team? NO, do the Saints actually have a rushing game? YES, are the Saints better in terms of offense, YES.
Doesn't take a darn rocket scientist to figure that out.
Hell, my high school QB just set a record for passing yards in a season last night. Why? He has a full ride to WSU (so you know he's not good) but our team is 1 dimensional! That's why!
there is a reason Brady threw 50 TD's... one dimensional teams can't do that... if it was then there would be many more teams throwing 50 TD's... it was that the Pats offense was unstoppable for the most part.
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/eaforum/templates/default/skins/ea_sports/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11/04/2009 20:12:57
|
dawkinseffect15
Joined: 11/01/2009 11:18:46
Messages: 64
Offline
|
cem_ea_id.tombradykiksars wrote:Red this first too...
http://espn.go.com/page2/s/list/nfl/offenses/best.html
I can't even put the Saints above the 49ers led by Young LOL, and the Pats are equal to or better than the Rams... the only reason people even think so is because they don't like the Pats LOL.
I seriously can't believe you think we actually care about what you post or about the 2007 pats...stop living in the past
|
ea_id.tombradykiksars wrote:
"not being able to walk IS life threatening buddy. you don't have to die to have your life threatened."
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/eaforum/templates/default/skins/ea_sports/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11/04/2009 20:14:19
|
tombradykiksars
Joined: 11/04/2009 17:51:05
Messages: 160
Offline
|
cem_ea_id.dawkinseffect15 wrote:
cem_ea_id.tombradykiksars wrote:Red this first too...
http://espn.go.com/page2/s/list/nfl/offenses/best.html
I can't even put the Saints above the 49ers led by Young LOL, and the Pats are equal to or better than the Rams... the only reason people even think so is because they don't like the Pats LOL.
I seriously can't believe you think we actually care about what you post or about the 2007 pats...stop living in the past
you guys seem to care since you guys post, and why do people care about the current best offenses? they are in the past too...
|
|
|
 |
|
|