| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 11/16/2009 19:24:22
|
BOO XBOX GRRR
Joined: 08/18/2009 21:32:24
Messages: 15
Offline
|
My player got tripped on the breakaway so I had a delayed penalty shot (which happens wayyyyyyyy to often). I maintained possession of the puck, passed it back to my D men and shot it from the point. The puck got deflected and was bouncing around... then one of the dmen on the other team slapped it out of the air (keep in mind I still had a delayed penalty) but the ref did not blow the whistle. In fact, the d-man slapped it from infront of his goalies crease, all the way down the ice into my empty net(cuz of the delayed call). Not only that but I did not get my penalty shot afterwards. FML
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 11/16/2009 19:32:39
|
FIFFFA
Joined: 03/02/2009 11:05:05
Messages: 486
Offline
|
lol
thats pretty brutal though how NHL09 was fine, there was no delayed penalty shot, then in NHL10 they decide to change it and go against NHL rules? Like why even bother changing it, it was right in 09, EA is unbelievable sometimes. Your going to tell me not one tester noticed the delayed penalty shot during testing? Either they were to lazy to go back and re-code or the dev team just doesn't know hockey, period.
|
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 11/16/2009 20:38:57
|
WheresUrLazyEye...
Joined: 05/13/2009 14:30:02
Messages: 506
Offline
|
that is nhl rules....its a delayed penatly...but usually if tripped on the breakaway you don't get the puck right back or you shoot a desperation shot. but a computer hitting it in mid air is considered playing it so you should have gotten the PS and they shouldn't have gotten the goal
|
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 11/17/2009 12:21:09
|
SteveRiprock
Joined: 07/15/2009 17:52:14
Messages: 307
Location: Ottawa, ON
Offline
|
I got a roughing penalty on a penalty shot.
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 11/17/2009 12:25:05
|
VictorMackey
Joined: 03/13/2009 00:29:06
Messages: 1192
Offline
|
computer scored on me on a delayed penalty just like that one of the first games i played.
|
tgalv |
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 11/17/2009 12:39:05
|
M4ck4n
Joined: 12/09/2008 18:33:25
Messages: 94
Offline
|
You can score on the open net if you slap it out of the air or poke the puck into the net. Poking the puck into the net worked in 09 aswell..
The delayed penalty shots are completely bugged, there are several things that can ruin you chances of geting it. Dunno if it has been fixed but if the puck went over the glass after the penalty shot was called you wouldn't get one, same if the period ends. Not only will you not get a penalty shot, the player won't get a penalty.
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 11/17/2009 12:44:11
|
MFPEDRO
Joined: 09/15/2007 12:59:38
Messages: 149
Offline
|
I'm thinking they didn't want to whistle immediately on a penalty shot so they could show-off the 'on the knees' animation.
The lack of a whistle on the thread starter's post is due to the fact that the game doesn't recognize the batted puck, or even poke check as a puck possession. You could basically poke the puck around all the way down the ice and score on a delayed call as long as you don't take possession. That's a bug.
edit: M4ck4n beat me to it...
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 11/17/2009 12:45:20
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 11/17/2009 13:45:39
|
pocolocotoco33
Joined: 09/01/2009 20:49:49
Messages: 139
Offline
|
xbox.SteveRiprock wrote:I got a roughing penalty on a penalty shot.
By poking at the goalie?
LMAO
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 11/22/2009 12:29:52
|
SteveRiprock
Joined: 07/15/2009 17:52:14
Messages: 307
Location: Ottawa, ON
Offline
|
cem_ea_id.pocolocotoco33 wrote:
xbox.SteveRiprock wrote:I got a roughing penalty on a penalty shot.
By poking at the goalie?
LMAO
Yeah. I felt it was stupid that it took 20 seconds to resume the game. No need for the goalie to cover the puck after a penalty shot for that long.
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 11/22/2009 15:14:59
|
gosharks14
Team Captain
Joined: 09/12/2008 18:57:06
Messages: 380
Offline
|
This is where the controversial issue of control versus a deflection comes into play. I guess a slap out of the air is not technically control of the puck so the goal should count. It is also unfair that the penalized team was able to score by batting it out of the air though. This is a big issue and I cannot decide where the league should draw the line.
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 11/22/2009 15:16:41
|
illeatyobiscuit...
Joined: 12/31/2008 05:13:55
Messages: 417
Offline
|
xbox.SteveRiprock wrote:
cem_ea_id.pocolocotoco33 wrote:
xbox.SteveRiprock wrote:I got a roughing penalty on a penalty shot.
By poking at the goalie?
LMAO
Yeah. I felt it was stupid that it took 20 seconds to resume the game. No need for the goalie to cover the puck after a penalty shot for that long.
I did that too. It was amusing.
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 11/22/2009 15:22:30
|
VINCENTUPPERCUT...
Joined: 11/27/2008 18:11:57
Messages: 701
Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 11/22/2009 16:20:03
|
scojo28
Joined: 10/12/2009 12:35:04
Messages: 159
Offline
|
xbox.MFPEDRO wrote:I'm thinking they didn't want to whistle immediately on a penalty shot so they could show-off the 'on the knees' animation.
The lack of a whistle on the thread starter's post is due to the fact that the game doesn't recognize the batted puck, or even poke check as a puck possession. You could basically poke the puck around all the way down the ice and score on a delayed call as long as you don't take possession. That's a bug.
edit: M4ck4n beat me to it...
this is not true, you can score on a poke check and the goal is credited to you so the game does recognize that as a possession, otherwise you wouldn't get credit for the goal and i know you do b/c i scored in ot on bap in the prospects game on a poke check to win the game and the goal was credited to me
|
If it's not in the game, don't put it in the game |
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/nhl12/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.26) 11/23/2009 06:47:52
|
Beans1973
Joined: 09/11/2009 06:49:14
Messages: 494
Offline
|
you were probably just the last player on your team to play the puck properly before you poked it in.
If you have a situation in front of the net where you disposses someone with a poke check and a team mate picks up the puck and scores ( no more passes) you get no assist either... 'cos the poke check isnt registered as possesion.
|
#73 Mr Bump |
|
|
 |
|
|