| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/battlefield_bad_company/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.29) 05/27/2008 05:27:29
|
tactician
Joined: 04/02/2008 08:46:28
Messages: 293
Offline
|
OPERATIVE ALERT! OPERATIVE ALERT! BEWARE! BEWARE! Trying to change subject here beware!
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/battlefield_bad_company/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.29) 05/27/2008 06:09:01
|
DeadRising2Day
Joined: 05/03/2008 04:04:17
Messages: 51
Offline
|
[sarcasm]Well thank god your here to point that out.......[sarcasm]
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/battlefield_bad_company/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.29) 05/27/2008 07:00:18
|
fatt47
Joined: 03/28/2008 09:34:38
Messages: 709
Offline
|
> My main issue with games these days is the complaints
> of "camping". While I would be more than willing to
> allow prone, I'm worried as the sniping was OPd in
> modern combat. COD4 does make it easier to find the
> sniper within a smaller area, but if you shoot and
> move appropriately there is nothing keeping you from
> going 30 and 5 or whatever. America's army was built
> around making a true-to-life simulation, and quite
> frankly I wanted to die after playing for 10 minutes
> lol.
>
> I just remember the same kind of comments being
> thrown around prior to the releases of BF2 and BF2MC,
> and change were made to accommodate them, which were
> later patched back after release due to balance
> issues. Unfortunately we aren't seeing the
> discussion or testing behind the scenes. The Hitbox
> argument sounds quite reasonable. If they are aiming
> at making the weapons fire with more spread, a target
> prone far away would suck.
>
> But like I've said, the key to this is constructive
> arguments about how it could ADD to the game, or
> arguments stating facts that support that balance is
> present with prone. I'm sure with the LARGE amount
> of hours that will be played for the demo by both
> casual and hardcore alike will allow them to
> supervise gameplay well. Comparison to other games
> and their success has NOTHING to do with it. While
> it will be difficult to get used to no prone, it will
> change the play type. Eventually we will adapt to
> conditions. Rainbow 6 has always been highly
> successful as well, yet has no prone or quick snap
> aim. (BTW will BFBC be a quick snap like COD/GOW?
> Or click and stay like prior releases?)
>
> It has already been programmed into the gaming
> engine, so all it would take is a patch to fix it
> (much simpler than even Conquest mode). I personally
> haven't even seen the beta in action, so Thursday
> will be when I decide if i miss prone or not.
Those are some good and interesting points and opinions ZiPP3RZ I agree with most of em.
Like you I'm sure I'll adapt to what we get and I hope others who have desires of what they'd enjoy will be satisfied with it also, maybe they will see the light and give us some patches and or features that allow us to setup some game layouts that have a bit more depth to the gameplay, more realistic with some thinking is my main desire.
I don't know yet if I'll be getting the demo early or at the regular time but whenever I'm very anxious to see how it plays and what features will be available or at least show what the real game will have.
Good message there ZiPP
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](http://cdn.forum.ea.com/eaforum/templates/default/skins/en_US/battlefield_bad_company/images/icon_minipost_new.gif?v2.29) 05/27/2008 07:07:21
|
fatt47
Joined: 03/28/2008 09:34:38
Messages: 709
Offline
|
> > everyone is entitled to an opinion as long as
> the
> > express it with class and within the TOS IMO
>
>
> Your opinion counts very little here! and while you
> may think your posts are expressed with class, others
> may think differently, so stop repeating yourself,
> and stop sounding like you're better than others
> because we're all here for the same reason and you're
> no better than anybody else.
Ya know tactician whether my opinion counts very little here or not doesn't really matter to me and you should worry about tactician and not FATT OK.
I gave an opinion of how and to what level I personally try to partake of posting, within the realm of the TOS and if you think that was meant for you or anyone else then once again, you are wrong, it was meant as a self agenda for me.
I don't sound like I'm better then anyone else, I'm not, I'm just expressing my opinions in my style and if that doesn't suite you then do the easiest thing and don't read my messages.
Speaking of repeating oneself? you have no trouble doing that from what I've seen.
Move on, I now have.
|
|
|
 |
|
|