http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/10/ap-will-redo-defensive-roy-vote-with-cushing-as-a-candidate/



i say just give it to guy who came in second with the most votes.

imo it should go to either Byrd or Matthews.

Byrd should get it.

we are already talking about this in the brian cushing 4 game suspension thread

Stupid just move on. Are people actually going to cry about this? Even if they do take it away from Cushing and give it to the next person, they'll still be known as the runner up

xbox.CrAzAnEsS wrote:Stupid just move on. Are people actually going to cry about this? Even if they do take it away from Cushing and give it to the next person, they'll still be known as the runner up

It's still not just to allow cheaters to win.

xbox.CrAzAnEsS wrote:Stupid just move on. Are people actually going to cry about this? Even if they do take it away from Cushing and give it to the next person, they'll still be known as the runner up

Doesn't really matter much to me but it makes pretty logical sense to strip that person of anything they won the previous season.

cem_ea_id.Asomugha wrote:

xbox.CrAzAnEsS wrote:Stupid just move on. Are people actually going to cry about this? Even if they do take it away from Cushing and give it to the next person, they'll still be known as the runner up

Doesn't really matter much to me but it makes pretty logical sense to strip that person of anything they won the previous season.

then lets strip Julius Peppers of his in 2002 when he got suspended 4 games his rookie year

cem_ea_id.DawkinsEffect35 wrote:

cem_ea_id.Asomugha wrote:

xbox.CrAzAnEsS wrote:Stupid just move on. Are people actually going to cry about this? Even if they do take it away from Cushing and give it to the next person, they'll still be known as the runner up

Doesn't really matter much to me but it makes pretty logical sense to strip that person of anything they won the previous season.

then lets strip Julius Peppers of his in 2002 when he got suspended 4 games his rookie year

I don't think the circumstances are the same. Peppers if i'm not mistaken was suspended during his rookie season, not afterwards. And it was not for a PED rather a dietary supplemant.

Also the NFL was under different management in '02, and Goodell has shown to be more a dsiciplenary than previous Commisioners.

cem_ea_id.DawkinsEffect35 wrote:

cem_ea_id.Asomugha wrote:

xbox.CrAzAnEsS wrote:Stupid just move on. Are people actually going to cry about this? Even if they do take it away from Cushing and give it to the next person, they'll still be known as the runner up

Doesn't really matter much to me but it makes pretty logical sense to strip that person of anything they won the previous season.

then lets strip Julius Peppers of his in 2002 when he got suspended 4 games his rookie year

I was wondering why you were being hostile.. but after a few minutes I realized your second team is the Texans and you're being biased towards the situation.

MAIN.stokeyokes83 wrote:

cem_ea_id.DawkinsEffect35 wrote:

cem_ea_id.Asomugha wrote:

xbox.CrAzAnEsS wrote:Stupid just move on. Are people actually going to cry about this? Even if they do take it away from Cushing and give it to the next person, they'll still be known as the runner up

Doesn't really matter much to me but it makes pretty logical sense to strip that person of anything they won the previous season.

then lets strip Julius Peppers of his in 2002 when he got suspended 4 games his rookie year

I don't think the circumstances are the same. Peppers if i'm not mistaken was suspended during his rookie season, not afterwards. And it was not for a PED rather a dietary supplemant.

Also the NFL was under different management in '02, and Goodell has shown to be more a dsiciplenary than previous Commisioners.

he was suspended during the season and then won the award afterwords. atleast with Cushing he tested negative DURING the season