PC guys dont deserve BC 2

50 on 50 battles you say? Try MAG on the PS3 (only PS3) 128 thats 128 versus 128, yes thats 256 player battles all battling it out. Your saying PC's should be aiming for 50v50 but PS3 is bringing out 128vs128

There you go.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 06/23/2009 10:00:00

How about deal that every platform get every game. That is fairest i think (don't get the 10 yo fight from best and deserving games)

The gamestyles that were mentioned before are true. Those are different between consoles and PC, but i think that we will see more similar gamestyles in future cause the new gen consoles are having/getting mouse and keyboard support (PS has and i think Xbox will get)

I don't really care about PC players getting this game, what I care about is us getting the real BF series, like the 3 that is production, I want the whole package, not some dumbed down crappy version that consoles been getting in past years.

couldnt care less about pc fanboys hating on the console.. bad company 1 was awsome and 2 will be even better!! if people want to play no game if it doesnt have 64 players well whatever .. your loss lol!

1. consoles are way too touchy with aim (like like to hit my target)
2. a lot of good games are ONLY going to console (ps3 specificly)
3. i want to destroy stuff
that is why pc gamers should get bfbc2 and consoles should just die (not the console gamers though)

xbox.Mercenary Nox wrote:Couldn't agree more with the OP because all i have to say for most of the PC guys.

Then play a freaken different game! Things change sorry, it happens. *, some of you people need a life, its JUST A GAME, a GAME! If we were debating some kind of huge change in congress or ballistic nukes be launched alright whatever, but I have also noticed how the PC community are probably the most whiney i've ever seen. They rival PETA.

Holy *, they didn't make BF2 again! Oh no, they changed it, now its horrible. Aw crap they decided to move on and make some serious cash by going to consoles. Too bad. There are plenty of other amazing PC games out there right now, many better then BF2, 1942, or any of DICE's creations could hope to be (Though they are definately capable). "Its not exactly the same so I'm not going to buy" See ya later, because no one is going to miss you.

Not to mention BF3 is in the works, this isn't BF3, were sorry. When they create a forum for that you can spend your entire day making sure everything is in check.

If it was the consoles whining so much, I'd say the exact same thing. Move on or get the hell out of the way. I say that because I own a PS3, 360, AND PC(obviously). How? Because I did what some people here need to do and got a good paying job.

All this goes beyond BF and many other titles for PC turned console aswell. Also like i said, this goes for MOST PC gamers, not all. As some of you are very constructive and the like.

dude, some of us just wanted to destroy * in bfbc1 and now get to in bfbc2 so my minority is happy

why all the hating? you can even tell buy the title that this was gonna happen. i think that pc, ps3, & 360 should all get the title.

pc is where bf started i like it and i want to play BFBC2 on console because the game will need required specs so the game release for consoles is goin towards people who dont have powerful computers i want cross platform multiplayer like lost planet

bfheroes.AlexoEx0 wrote:50 on 50 battles you say? Try MAG on the PS3 (only PS3) 128 thats 128 versus 128, yes thats 256 player battles all battling it out. Your saying PC's should be aiming for 50v50 but PS3 is bringing out 128vs128

There you go.

\

lets try WoW more players than MAG even if the game isnt released

cem_ea_id.natonio94 wrote:

bfheroes.AlexoEx0 wrote:50 on 50 battles you say? Try MAG on the PS3 (only PS3) 128 thats 128 versus 128, yes thats 256 player battles all battling it out. Your saying PC's should be aiming for 50v50 but PS3 is bringing out 128vs128

There you go.

\

lets try WoW more players than MAG even if the game isnt released

lol WoW is the most ugly game in the world if played it for 3 years and if experienced more lagg and disconnects there as in any other online game.. and wow isnt a shooter nor is it heavy on the servers

This is pathetic. I own both consoles and a pc, and play both.

I think this is want they want to hear:

PCs are superior.

Consoles are more fun.
---------------------------------
This is what every body else hears:

PC: Sheez, i'm getting lonely. Pass the mountain dew.

Console: OMG! LOLWUT! PWNED! DID YOU SEE THAT?!? REPAIR +15!

End of argument.

cem_ea_id.T1M-95 wrote:This is pathetic. I own both consoles and a pc, and play both.

I think this is want they want to hear:

PCs are superior.

Consoles are more fun.
---------------------------------
This is what every body else hears:

PC: Sheez, i'm getting lonely. Pass the mountain dew.

Console: OMG! LOLWUT! PWNED! DID YOU SEE THAT?!? REPAIR +15!

End of argument.

hmm superior.. or more fun .. Such a hard choice
il take the easy fun way ty

cem_ea_id.Evil_Paladin wrote:Before I start, remember this is controversy what all Im about to say. These are opinions stated by me and only me and Im asking to either be set straight or a friendly debate. Constructive critism on both parts are welcomed. When EA and DICE announce 1943 and BC 2 and later info were released on them. I notice PC fans mostly had a problem with it, degrading console games and console friendly games. They dogged EA and DICE and all EA DICE wants to do is make great games. Well the PC guys dont deserve it! Sure it started with them but cant they see now days consoles and PC can share the lime light.

But no, instead they want to hate on it. I have been talked down to by PC guys and watch my upcoming fav 1943 be dogged and I am mad as hell and Im going to stand up for it! Sure, DICE and EA want a profit but they want to also make good games. PC guys are always like if it isnt 64 players then Im not buying, without even giving it a second glance. Not all PC guys are like this but most of the ones I met are. They downgraded, spit in the face and hated on 1943 and BC 2 without knowing more info on BC 2. Im going to catch hell for this, but I got to speak up!

EA and DICE just focus on the console market because most of us appreciate what you do. Some of us but not all are later generation battlefield fans and we understand the need for new things. We are more accepting. If the PC community cannot get the picture, then maybe they dont deserve battlefield. Im a paying customer and I have a lot of respect for battlefield. I just want the PC guys to stop bashing the games and give them a chance, if you did that maybe I wouldnt post what I did!

I can gladly say i agree with nothing in this post. This guy clearly knows nothing about how games work and just sits on his console all day playing hello kitty island adventure, praying for battlefield games to come out on consoles only. Us PC gamers are the real gamers, who know what it takes for a game to be succesful. This lard * knows nothing about the history of battlefield games, and the mistakes EA and dice made while patching the games. Yes EA and Dice make decent games, but its keeping them decent which is their problem. Sucking up to EA and Dice claiming you have loyalty is utter trash. These companys don't care about pleasing the different markets, they just want to make maximum profit.

cem_ea_id.Evil_Paladin wrote:Before I start, remember this is controversy what all Im about to say. These are opinions stated by me and only me and Im asking to either be set straight or a friendly debate. Constructive critism on both parts are welcomed. When EA and DICE announce 1943 and BC 2 and later info were released on them. I notice PC fans mostly had a problem with it, degrading console games and console friendly games. They dogged EA and DICE and all EA DICE wants to do is make great games. Well the PC guys dont deserve it! Sure it started with them but cant they see now days consoles and PC can share the lime light.

But no, instead they want to hate on it. I have been talked down to by PC guys and watch my upcoming fav 1943 be dogged and I am mad as hell and Im going to stand up for it! Sure, DICE and EA want a profit but they want to also make good games. PC guys are always like if it isnt 64 players then Im not buying, without even giving it a second glance. Not all PC guys are like this but most of the ones I met are. They downgraded, spit in the face and hated on 1943 and BC 2 without knowing more info on BC 2. Im going to catch hell for this, but I got to speak up!

EA and DICE just focus on the console market because most of us appreciate what you do. Some of us but not all are later generation battlefield fans and we understand the need for new things. We are more accepting. If the PC community cannot get the picture, then maybe they dont deserve battlefield. Im a paying customer and I have a lot of respect for battlefield. I just want the PC guys to stop bashing the games and give them a chance, if you did that maybe I wouldnt post what I did!

I can gladly say i agree with nothing in this post. This guy clearly knows nothing about how games work and just sits on his console all day playing hello kitty island adventure, praying for battlefield games to come out on consoles only. Us PC gamers are the real gamers, who know what it takes for a game to be succesful. This lard * knows nothing about the history of battlefield games, and the mistakes EA and dice made while patching the games. Yes EA and Dice make decent games, but its keeping them decent which is their problem. Sucking up to EA and Dice claiming you have loyalty is utter trash. These companys don't care about pleasing the different markets, they just want to make maximum profit.

+1

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 07/23/2009 07:10:28

1

Electronic Arts

Highlighted Game

Mass Effect 3